This tool is for research exploration only. It is not a medical device and does not provide medical advice. Drug candidates, evidence scores, and AI-generated content are not clinical recommendations. Always consult your medical team before making any treatment decisions.

Back to Drug Candidates

Tiragolumab

Anti-TIGIT monoclonal antibody (TIGIT checkpoint inhibitor)

Evidence Score

20

theoretical
Mechanism of Action

Tiragolumab (MTIG7192A) is an investigational human IgG1 antibody directed against TIGIT, not CD155 itself. Structural data show blockade of the TIGIT-PVR interaction (RCSB 8JEO). Unvalidated SDH research hypothesis: succinate-associated pseudohypoxia might alter CD155/PVR expression and TIGIT checkpoint activity. Neither this chain nor selective benefit from TIGIT blockade is established in SDH-deficient cancers by the sources reviewed. No SDH-specific tiragolumab result was verified in this review. This is a research lead, not a treatment recommendation. Eskandari et al. (PMID 42160101, Effect of HIF-1α and LDHA Blockade on Gene Expression of Tumor Immune Evasion in Myeloid Leukemia Cell Lines) treated HL-60 and K-562 leukemia cells with silibinin or sodium oxamate for 48 hours. Silibinin reduced CD155 mRNA in HL-60 but not K-562; sodium oxamate did not significantly change CD155 expression. The authors call these pharmacologically induced associations, not direct evidence of HIF-1α or LDHA pathway blockade. They do not establish CD155 protein changes, immune-cell function, direct HIF-promoter binding or an SDH-specific dependency. Completed Phase 3 SKYSCRAPER-01 (NCT04294810) tested tiragolumab plus atezolizumab against placebo plus atezolizumab in previously untreated PD-L1-high advanced NSCLC. The final publication (PMID 42507968, J Clin Oncol 2026) reported no statistically significant progression-free or overall survival benefit under the study criteria. Combination results do not establish tiragolumab monotherapy benefit or SDH-specific efficacy. Sources: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42160101/ ; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13535869/ ; https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42507968/ ; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04294810 ; https://www.rcsb.org/structure/8JEO ; https://db.antibodysociety.org/db0/1038 .

Pathway Connections
Succinate-Driven Immune Evasion

SDH loss creates an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment through two distinct succinate-dependent mechanisms: (1) extracellular succinate is directly taken up by tumor-infiltrating T cells via MCT1 (SLC16A1), impairing TCA-cycle glucose oxidation in T cells and suppressing IFN-γ secretion and degranulation — demonstrated in human CD4+/CD8+ T cells at tumor-associated succinate concentrations (Gudgeon et al., Cell Rep 2022, PMID 35977513), with RNA-seq of SDH-deficient pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma confirming profound in-vivo IFN-γ signaling suppression; and (2) the pseudohypoxic HIF-1α program drives upregulation of IDO1 (indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1), the rate-limiting enzyme in the tryptophan→kynurenine degradation pathway, with aberrant kynurenine pathway activity confirmed in metastatic SDHB-driven PPGL by multi-omics (PMID 42230482). Together these mechanisms create a profoundly T-cell-hostile TME in SDH-deficient tumors.

Upstream event:

SDH loss → intracellular and extracellular succinate accumulation; HIF-1α stabilization (pseudohypoxia)

Downstream effects:

MCT1-mediated succinate uptake by CD4+/CD8+ T cells in TMESuppressed T-cell IFN-γ secretion and degranulationHIF-1α-driven IDO1 upregulationKynurenine accumulation → Treg expansion and T-cell anergyBroad IFN-γ signaling suppression in SDH-deficient tumor tissue
CD155/PVR-TIGIT Immune Evasion (unvalidated SDH hypothesis)

Unvalidated SDH research hypothesis: succinate-associated pseudohypoxia might alter CD155/PVR expression and TIGIT checkpoint activity. Neither this chain nor selective benefit from TIGIT blockade is established in SDH-deficient cancers by the sources reviewed. No SDH-specific tiragolumab result was verified in this review. This is a research lead, not a treatment recommendation. Eskandari et al. (PMID 42160101, Effect of HIF-1α and LDHA Blockade on Gene Expression of Tumor Immune Evasion in Myeloid Leukemia Cell Lines) treated HL-60 and K-562 leukemia cells with silibinin or sodium oxamate for 48 hours. Silibinin reduced CD155 mRNA in HL-60 but not K-562; sodium oxamate did not significantly change CD155 expression. The authors call these pharmacologically induced associations, not direct evidence of HIF-1α or LDHA pathway blockade. They do not establish CD155 protein changes, immune-cell function, direct HIF-promoter binding or an SDH-specific dependency. Completed Phase 3 SKYSCRAPER-01 (NCT04294810) tested tiragolumab plus atezolizumab against placebo plus atezolizumab in previously untreated PD-L1-high advanced NSCLC. The final publication (PMID 42507968, J Clin Oncol 2026) reported no statistically significant progression-free or overall survival benefit under the study criteria. Combination results do not establish tiragolumab monotherapy benefit or SDH-specific efficacy.

Upstream event:

Hypothesis only: SDH-associated pseudohypoxia may alter CD155/PVR expression; causality and TIGIT dependency require direct SDH-specific testing.

Downstream effects:

TIGIT is an inhibitory receptor that interacts with CD155/PVR; tiragolumab binds TIGIT and blocks this interaction (RCSB 8JEO)Leukemia-cell CD155 mRNA changes after silibinin do not establish HIF-driven CD155 expression or immune exhaustion in SDH tumorsSDH-specific ligand expression, functional immune effects and benefit from TIGIT blockade remain unresolved
Molecular Targets

TIGIT

T-cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains

downstream

TIGIT is the direct target of tiragolumab; CD155/PVR is its ligand, not the antibody target. The TIGIT-tiragolumab complex and UniProt identity are documented by RCSB 8JEO. Unvalidated SDH research hypothesis: succinate-associated pseudohypoxia might alter CD155/PVR expression and TIGIT checkpoint activity. Neither this chain nor selective benefit from TIGIT blockade is established in SDH-deficient cancers by the sources reviewed. No SDH-specific tiragolumab result was verified in this review. This is a research lead, not a treatment recommendation. Eskandari et al. (PMID 42160101, Effect of HIF-1α and LDHA Blockade on Gene Expression of Tumor Immune Evasion in Myeloid Leukemia Cell Lines) treated HL-60 and K-562 leukemia cells with silibinin or sodium oxamate for 48 hours. Silibinin reduced CD155 mRNA in HL-60 but not K-562; sodium oxamate did not significantly change CD155 expression. The authors call these pharmacologically induced associations, not direct evidence of HIF-1α or LDHA pathway blockade. They do not establish CD155 protein changes, immune-cell function, direct HIF-promoter binding or an SDH-specific dependency. Completed Phase 3 SKYSCRAPER-01 (NCT04294810) tested tiragolumab plus atezolizumab against placebo plus atezolizumab in previously untreated PD-L1-high advanced NSCLC. The final publication (PMID 42507968, J Clin Oncol 2026) reported no statistically significant progression-free or overall survival benefit under the study criteria. Combination results do not establish tiragolumab monotherapy benefit or SDH-specific efficacy. Sources: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42160101/ ; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13535869/ ; https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42507968/ ; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04294810 ; https://www.rcsb.org/structure/8JEO ; https://db.antibodysociety.org/db0/1038 .

UniProt: Q495A1

Quick Facts

Tumor Type Applicability

All SDH tumors
Not FDA Approved
Clinical Trials
Evidence

Evidence from PubMed, OpenTargets, and ChEMBL will appear here once external data integration is enabled.

Coming in Phase 3

For research exploration only — not medical advice. Consult your doctor before acting on any information.

AI Analysis

Have Claude analyze this drug's repurposing potential for SDH-deficient diseases.